ScummVM 0.9.0 "The OmniBrain loves you" released

General chat related to ScummVM, adventure gaming, and so on.

Moderator: ScummVM Team

User avatar
sev
ScummVM Lead
Posts: 2278
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:06 pm
Contact:

ScummVM 0.9.0 "The OmniBrain loves you" released

Post by sev »

It has been almost 8 months since we started to work on the 0.9.x code branch and today we're pleased to announce the release of ScummVM 0.9.0 "The OmniBrain loves you".

Many things are waiting for you, one of the most noticeable is the new and improved GUI. We also added support for 2 completely new games -- The Legend of Kyrandia and The Feeble Files.

Other important changes include:
  • Reworked detection code for SCUMM games. Now all your fan translations will work out of the box
  • Added subtitle configuration controls to the options dialog
  • New official Atari/MiNT port
  • Much improved WinCE port
  • Numerous bugfixes in the SCUMM, SAGA, Simon, Broken Sword 2 and BASS engines
For the complete list read the release notes.

Unfortunately not all ports are built yet and also you may experience some problems with downloads as not all SourceForge mirrors picked up the files. So, please, try different mirrors and be patient.

Don't wait any longer, go and fetch a build for your platform on our downloads page.


Eugene
Last edited by sev on Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
LordHoto
ScummVM Developer
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Germany

Post by LordHoto »

Happy adventuring then and have fun with the newly supported games!

// Johannes
User avatar
Adventureguy
Posts: 162
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 4:09 pm
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany

Post by Adventureguy »

Finally, how long I waited for this moment. Finally another stable release of ScummVM. Honestly, I like the stable version better than the unstable daily snapshots (because it's more stable, of course :wink: ) . Well, I guess in, like, one year it's then ScummVM 1.0.0, isn't it? :wink: But hey, take your time and let's all have fun with this version, and may ScummVM have many more releases! :D
User avatar
MetaFox
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:44 am

Post by MetaFox »

Adventureguy wrote:Well, I guess in, like, one year it's then ScummVM 1.0.0, isn't it? :wink:
The next stable release will be 1.10.0
clem
Posts: 2159
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:14 am

Post by clem »

MetaFox wrote: The next stable release will be 1.10.0
0.10.0, actually (or 0.9.1?) :)
User avatar
MetaFox
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:44 am

Post by MetaFox »

clem wrote:
MetaFox wrote: The next stable release will be 1.10.0
0.10.0, actually (or 0.9.1?) :)
Ha - yeah. I screwed up that one royally. I guess I have egg on my face now.
User avatar
Adventureguy
Posts: 162
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2005 4:09 pm
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany

Post by Adventureguy »

clem wrote:
MetaFox wrote: The next stable release will be 1.10.0
0.10.0, actually (or 0.9.1?) :)
Wouldn't It be 1.0.0 ? That would seem to be a more logical release number than 0.10.0 imho, but it's your interpreter, you can decide what your next release number is named. Heck, why not ScummVM release 42.77.891 ? :lol: :wink:
User avatar
LordHoto
ScummVM Developer
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Germany

Post by LordHoto »

Adventureguy wrote:Wouldn't It be 1.0.0 ? That would seem to be a more logical release number than 0.10.0 imho, but it's your interpreter, you can decide what your next release number is named. Heck, why not ScummVM release 42.77.891 ? :lol: :wink:
Any reason why 1.0.0 would be more logical than 0.10.0?
Grobo
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:27 pm

Post by Grobo »

Just registered to say THANK YOU for this awesome program! You guys rock! Well, maybe not as much as a three-headed-monkey, but pretty darn close!

Keep up the great work! :)
clem
Posts: 2159
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:14 am

Post by clem »

LordHoto wrote:Any reason why 1.0.0 would be more logical than 0.10.0?
0.10.0 is about as logical as 0.A.0 :-)
joachimeberhard
ScummVM Team Member
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Austria

Post by joachimeberhard »

LordHoto wrote:
Adventureguy wrote:Wouldn't It be 1.0.0 ? That would seem to be a more logical release number than 0.10.0 imho, but it's your interpreter, you can decide what your next release number is named. Heck, why not ScummVM release 42.77.891 ? :lol: :wink:
Any reason why 1.0.0 would be more logical than 0.10.0?
Heh, it's pretty common for Open Source Software not to reach 1.0.0 too fast, as it would seem so.....stable! ;) :)
User avatar
MetaFox
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:44 am

Post by MetaFox »

Adventureguy wrote:
clem wrote:
MetaFox wrote: The next stable release will be 1.10.0
0.10.0, actually (or 0.9.1?) :)
Wouldn't It be 1.0.0 ? That would seem to be a more logical release number than 0.10.0 imho, but it's your interpreter, you can decide what your next release number is named. Heck, why not ScummVM release 42.77.891 ? :lol: :wink:
Version numbers in computer programs are not mathematical. They work like this:

major.minor.revision
clem
Posts: 2159
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:14 am

Post by clem »

MetaFox wrote:Version numbers in computer programs are not mathematical. They work like this:

major.minor.revision
you happen to know which version number Vista is gonna have? I sure don't ;)
User avatar
eriktorbjorn
ScummVM Developer
Posts: 3525
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 7:39 am

Post by eriktorbjorn »

clem wrote:you happen to know which version number Vista is gonna have? I sure don't ;)
If I understand this page correctly, it's 6.0 plus a build number and service pack major and minor version numbers.

The version numbers seem to mean different things depending on if it's Windows 9x or Windows NT.
clem
Posts: 2159
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:14 am

Post by clem »

could as well switch to roman numerals (Paint Shop Pro X anyone?)
0.X.0 looks nice :)

yeah, I know this is getting ridiculous
Post Reply