My question is: if I'm willing (and able) to add FreeSCI (glutton) to ScummVM, would you reject this? (as far as i know gpl i wouldn't even have to ask the freesci members) I know that until now there were a lot of discussion about that, but i can`t remember that somebody wanted to do it (only that people wanted it to be added).

   

quote:

---

Originally posted by Threepwood
My question is: if I'm willing (and able) to add FreeSCI (glutton) to ScummVM, would you reject this? (as far as i know gpl i wouldn't even have to ask the freesci members) I know that until now there were a lot of discussion about that, but i can`t remember that somebody wanted to do it (only that people wanted it to be added).

---

   

I'm only a ScummVM user since a few years and loving it, but I think FreeSCi being part of ScummVM could be very great. The last word of this is by ScummVM Team, but I hope this occour someday.

In the past, AGI was somewhat "alive", but now has been merged. Thanks to this, a new engine is added and the code base is very usable. The Sarien developers now benefit of the very portable backend infraestructure and a some nice devs maintaining it, so they only have to worry on their engine.

I see in SCI the same advantages as in AGI: FreeSCI developers will not worry about portability or bugs in the backend stuff, only worry about the engine. At the first it may be a pain in the ass porting the code to the ScummVM infraestructure and learning the new manner of coding, but then they will be part of a more knowed project, a lot more coders involved, more possible betatesters and only concentrating in the engine.

I think this can be great for FreeSCI since the development progress is a bit slower than usual, so the less work they will need to do in the code, the better.


Advantages:

- SCI engine ported to a lot more platforms.
- More possible betatesters.
- Being part of a lot more knowed project, a big one.
- Not worry about non-engine stuff after adapting the engine to the new infraestructure.
- More possible bugfixers.
- More possible developers because the project is more knowed.
- People want it since years!


Disadvantages:

- The code must be adapted to the new infraestucture and a motivated volunteer is needed for the task (it seems there are some volunteers now).
- Developers must learn the new coding manners of the ScummVM Team.
- The next release will be release later until the SCI engine goes stable on ScummVM (like on AGI).

   

Disadvantages:

- The support team is going to be swamped with bug reports, since that would be the first time a large public forum is opened for FreeSCI discussions (not counting Mega Tokyo).

   

I definitely think that you should ask to the freesci team.
It wouldn't be interesting to add a branch of freesci in scummvm if the freesci team wouldn't work on it. If so you would have to port every freesci changes to scummvm.

   

Any news Threepwood?

   

I just looked at the FreeSCI site, and it seems that FreeSCI is sadly as dead as a doornail..

So maybe it's good to port FreeSCI to ScummVM as AGI is also supported right now, that way we can play even more adventure games with ScummVM without the need for any other 'emulator'..

If I could find time I would even try to look at it myself..

   

Seems we really need to add a "Why won't you merge FreeSCI?" entry to our FAQ.

Until we do that, please search this forum for the numerous thread where people asked this questions and where we explained why this won't help and won't happen.
_________________
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Do not send private messages to me, they will be ignored. Use email instead.

   

quote:

---

Originally posted by fingolfin
Seems we really need to add a "Why won't you merge FreeSCI?" entry to our FAQ.

Until we do that, please search this forum for the numerous thread where people asked this questions and where we explained why this won't help and won't happen.

---

   

Two reasons: The FreeSCI team is not in favor, and there is nothing to be gained, since what FreeSCI is lacking is active developers, and those won't magically appear when "merging" it in. No AGI developers magically popped up when we merged Sarien, either!
_________________
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Do not send private messages to me, they will be ignored. Use email instead.

   

quote:

---

Originally posted by fingolfin
No AGI developers magically popped up when we merged Sarien, either!

---

   

Isn't this just like any another new engine? The developers currently aren't interested, but if someone else wanted to, no problem? Well, it seems Threepwood wants to do it and there doesn't seem to be any reason not to support his effort. As far as FreeSCI, the overall engine's been dead quite some time and the PocketPC port is even in worse shape. And yes, the previous discussion on this topic is actually a good deal sparser than I remembered. And I guess I'm wondering how SCUMMVM is any less "clean room" than FreeSCI was.

   

ScummVM is not at all clean room, it is primarly based on reverse engineering efforts. Hence the current FreeSCI developers are apparently not willing to "merge". Since they have are *the* experts on the matter, it would make no sense to try to work without them.


df is indeed an "old sarien monkey", so that in fact confirms what I said -- he didn't magically pop up, he was already there.

Merging FreeSCI won't magically add features or fix bugs. It requires lots of hard work to do that. To do it, one has to learn lots and lots about the internals of SCI -- or already know about them.

Finally, FreeSCI is open source, too, so if you really want to work on SCI code -- why not do it there?

All in all, I still haven't heard any plausible explanation why "merging" FreeSCI would improve its shape in any way.

Finally, if somebody wanted to work on such a merge, that person would of course be free to do it, but we are not willing to perform such a "merge" (or, as it would be properly named, "fork") without the consent of the FreeSCI developers.
_________________
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Do not send private messages to me, they will be ignored. Use email instead.

   

Maybe if the FreeSCI team was allowed to use the ScummVM menu GUI code for themselves, it would be an improvement to start the SCI games within FreeSCI.

Or perhaps someone who has still contact to the FreeSCI team could ask them politely if they wanted to join the ScummVM team .

Or is it possible that the FreeSCI team don't want to work on their project anymore and it's just as dead as Sarien was? So then, they just have to say something like "OK, we quit. You guys at ScummVM can work with our code if you like." and you could start working on the SCI engine if you wished.

I don't want to force anyone to start implementing the SCI engine already. It may take time. But I believe that someday ScummVM will support the SCI engine. Just a matter of time.

btw.: I think I've read somewhere in the forum that somebody wanted to negotiate with the FreeSCI team about slowy integrating the reeSCI team to the ScummVM team, but that this could take a few months or years(?).
_________________
"Paris in the Fall. The city holds many memories for me: of cafes, of music, of love... and of death." -BS1
If you can read this without copy and paste, you have a very good eyesight!

   

quote:

---

Originally posted by Adventureguy
Maybe if the FreeSCI team was allowed to use the ScummVM menu GUI code for themselves, it would be an improvement to start the SCI games within FreeSCI.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Adventureguy
Or perhaps someone who has still contact to the FreeSCI team could ask them politely if they wanted to join the ScummVM team .

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Adventureguy

Or is it possible that the FreeSCI team don't want to work on their project anymore and it's just as dead as Sarien was? So then, they just have to say something like "OK, we quit. You guys at ScummVM can work with our code if you like." and you could start working on the SCI engine if you wished.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Adventureguy

I don't want to force anyone to start implementing the SCI engine already. It may take time. But I believe that someday ScummVM will support the SCI engine. Just a matter of time.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Adventureguy

btw.: I think I've read somewhere in the forum that somebody wanted to negotiate with the FreeSCI team about slowy integrating the reeSCI team to the ScummVM team, but that this could take a few months or years(?).

---